This particular fox was large, meaning he was strong and capable enough to find food. This is remarkable since during the cold weather snap, it can’t be easy . So ‘a’ fox, to satisfy his hunger pains, manages to break through and catches chickens and later a cat.
The reason why this pathetic excuse for a vet, killed the fox, was because it was his mummy and daddy’s cat. Don’t get me wrong, I am a vegetarian, I don’t wear leather and am an extreme animal lover. Be it a pet or a wild animal, each have a place on this earth. BUT this animal killed another animal to survive. Check this out (extract from the article):
Mr Talbot spoke about the suspected attack by the fox on their cat. He said: “The cat was on the doormat when they (his parents) went to bed and heard some commotion.
“They saw a fox going up the drive later on that night, but didn’t think anything of it. Later that morning, they came out and there was fur and bits of the cat everywhere.” The vet ended up catching two foxes after setting the trap. Both animals were humanely destroyed.
First of all it was suspected that a fox killed it, if so, which fox ? During the current news, the police suspect that Chris Jefferies killed Miss Yeates. The police are still finding evidence before they prosecute, or clear his name. But since this case is an animal is it ok to kill ?
Yet this particular buffoon (vet) simply sees a fox coming up the path way and before you know it, sets a trap and kills not one, but two foxes. So what was it Talbot, the small fox or the larger one ? Or does it not matter you cold blooded killer. While you sit in your cosy home with a fridge full of food.
I know vets on a very friendly and professional basis and you Talbot are a disgrace and a lame excuse of a vet. You are supposed to protect pets and wildlife animals, that should be your ethics. It clearer shows you have none.
“…humanely killed’ : Says who, who witnessed the humane killed ?